The Supreme Court of Canada has granted leave to hear
an appeal relating to the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of
International Child Abduction.
The
father of the children in question, a permanent resident of Germany, obtained an order in Ontario under
the Convention for the children to move to Germany, on the grounds that Germany,
where they were born and lived until
2013, is their “habitual residence”. The
children had gone to Canada on a temporary basis for educational reasons. The father had sued in Germany first; an
appeal court there determined that Germany lacked jurisdiction as the children
were not German citizens and were resident in Canada at the time. He then sued
in Ontario.
The
appeal is brought by the Children’s Lawyer from an order of the Ontario Court of
Appeal for them to go to Germany, over the children’s objections.
Issues
to be addressed include the meaning of “habitual residence” in the Convention,
and whether it should be determined having regard only for the best interests
of the child or also with regard to the intentions of the care givers. As well, what weight ought to be given to
the preferences of the children? There
are also Charter issues, i.e. whether interpretation the Convention should be
in a manner consistent with child’s s. 7 Charter rights and right of child who
is a Canadian citizen to remain in Canada under s. 6(1).
The appeal might not be
heard because it has become moot. The
children in question returned to Canada after the leave application was filed,
as the result of the mother obtaining an order for custody from a court in
Germany.
No comments:
Post a Comment